Legal Opinion

Sommers v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1955No. 22220PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal has to do with the right, if any, of appellant (intervenor), as the compensation insurer of plaintiff’s employer, under the provisions of Section 287.150 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., a part of the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Act, to participate in a recovery by plaintiff-respondent of damages from the third party responsible for her injuries to the extent- of payments made and to be made by plaintiff-respondent by way of compensation, including payments for necessary medical care and hospitalization.

The question arose in this manner. On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Pruitt v. HarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. McKenzie v. Missouri Stables, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Elsas v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Evans v. Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boley v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Lawson v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Dearing v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Wiedower v. ACF Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. O'Hanlon Reports, Inc. v. NeedlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API