Pisano v. Door Control, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered June 18, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Door Control, Inc., for a protective order precluding the plaintiffs from deposing an employee of the plaintiffs’ choosing.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well established that a corporation has the right in the first instance to determine which of its representatives will appear for an examination before trial (see, Barone v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 260…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cleland v. 60-02 Woodside Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Defina v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Barone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Carter v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Saxe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EIFS, Inc. v. Morie Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ruthman, Mercadante & Hadjis, P. C. v. NardielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Brown v. Home Depot, U.S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Espinoza v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Rosado v. A & P Food StoreNew York Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.