Legal Opinion

Carter v. New York City Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs moved to compel the defendants to produce deposition witnesses with knowledge of the underlying incident or to provide them with information about employees who might have witnessed the incident. On such a motion, "the moving party must show (1) that the representatives already deposed had insufficient knowledge, or were otherwise inadequate, and (2) there is a substantial likelihood that the persons sought for depositions possess information which is material and necessary to the prosecution of the case” (Zollner v City of New York, 204 AD2d 626, 627).

The court properly denied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zollner v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc. v. Golden Valley Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Giordano v. New Rochelle Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Barone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Sladowski-Casolaro v. World Championship Wrestling, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Spohn-Konen v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API