Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

A municipality, in the first instance, has the right to determine which of its officers or employees with knowledge of the facts may appear for a deposition (see Douglas v New York City Tr. Auth., 48 AD3d 615, 616 [2008]; Simpson v City of New York, 10 AD3d 601, 603 [2004]; Pomilio-Young v City of New York, 7 AD3d 600 [2004]). A plaintiff may demand the production of additional witnesses upon a showing that (1) the representative already deposed had insufficient knowledge or was otherwise inadequate, and (2) there is a substantial likelihood that the person sought for deposition possesses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zollner v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc. v. Golden Valley Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Simpson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Douglas v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Pomilio-Young v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cea v. Edward ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API