Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Blair

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 13, 1886No. 580PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COUKT OE THE UNITED STATES' EOR THE ' DISTRICT OE NEBRASKA. This was an* action fór the possession of real estate. Judg- • ment. for plaintiff. Defendant; sued out this writ of error. The defendant in error moved to dismiss for want of jurisdictional value in the matter in. dispute.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

Our jurisdiction in this case depends on the value of the matter in dispute. Final judgment was entered in the action May 24,1884. At that time there was nothing in the record to show the valúe. On the 16th of September, 1884, on mo-, tion, leave was given the defendant in the court below to file affidavits of value that day, and the plaintiff to file counter, affidavits in twenty days. This was good practice, and, if oftener adopted, would save trouble to parties and to us. Under this leave, and others of a similar character, which were ■ afterwards granted, a considerable number of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gage v. PumpellySupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sharon v. TerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1888
  2. Forno v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. Red River Cattle Co. v. NeedhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Robinson v. Suburban Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904
  5. De La Torre v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API