Legal Opinion
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Sulpho-Saline Bath Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1924No. 6417PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
The Globe Company gave the Bath Company an insurance contract, indemnifying it on account of claims for personal injuries. One paragraph of that contract provided that if the assured had other similar insurance, the loss should be prorated. Another paragraph provided, in part, as follows:
“No action for the indemnity against loss provided for in insuring agreement I of this policy shall lie against the company, except for reimbursement of the amount of loss actually sustained and paid in money by the assured in full satisfaction of a judgment duly recovered against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Security State Bank v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Alexander v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by15 opinions
- People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Members Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hermann HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Omaha v. L'HerissonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Wilks v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.