Legal Opinion
LaPalme v. Romero
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 25, 1993No. 45A03-9209-CV-269PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellants-defendants Andre LaPalme (LaPalme) and Danaca Transport LTEE (Danaca) appeal the denial of their motions to set aside default judgment.
The facts relevant to the appeal disclose that on August 80, 1989, LaPalme was delivering steel to the Brennan Steel Company in Gary, Indiana, when his truck collided with an automobile driven by Juan Romero. On August 29, 1991, Juan and his wife, Delores, filed a complaint against La-Palme and his employer, Danaca, for negligence. At approximately 2:00 P.M. on January 17, 1992, the trial court entered a default judgment against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Penwell v. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. Van KeppelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Gary v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Keiling v. McIntireIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- LaPalme v. RomeroIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Bennett v. AndryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Teegardin v. Maver's, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cynthia L. Seleme v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as successor by merger to Chase Home FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jostens Learning Corp. v. Education System Corp. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.