Legal Opinion

Long v. Griffin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2014No. 11-1021PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal involves the evidence required to prove the reasonableness and necessity of attorney’s fees under the lodestar method. The parties raise an additional issue regarding postjudgment interest we do not reach. This Court has made clear that a party choosing the lodestar method of proving attorney’s fees must provide evidence of the time expended on specific tasks to enable the fact finder to meaningfully review the fee application. Here, the affidavit supporting the fee application generally stated the categories of tasks performed, but the application failed to include any evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. El Apple I, Ltd. v. OlivasTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. City of Laredo v. MontanoTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Long Trusts v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Long v. Castle Texas Production Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Michael Quinn Sullivan v. Salem AbrahamTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Virginia O. Kinsel, as Attorney-In-Fact for J. Frank Kinsel, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Carole K. Edwards, and Catherine K. Collins v. Jane O. Lindsey, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Lesey B. Kinsel Trust, Robert N. Oliver, Keith Branyon and Jackson Walker, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. United National Insurance Company v. AMJ Investments, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Tech Pharmacy Servs., LLC v. Alixa RX LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2017

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API