Legal Opinion

Long Trusts v. Griffin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2006No. 04-0825PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Per curiam

As this case comes to us, two important issues remain.

First: The parties agreed that petitioners would bdl the Griffin respondents monthly for their share of litigation expenses, the Griffins would pay each bid within thirty days of biding, and they would share in any recovery. Petitioners failed to bdl monthly, but later presented a bid for twenty months of accumulated expenses; the Griffin respondents refused to pay in full within thirty days, but demanded their share when the case settled some two years later. The court of appeals held that respondents were entitled to recover because…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilson v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. B & W SUPPLY, INC. v. Beckman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  2. Long v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Henry v. Masson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  4. Marcus Hiles v. Arnie & Company, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Berryman's South Fork, Inc. and Richard Berryman v. J. Baxter Brinkmann Internationial Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API