City of Laredo v. Montano
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this eminent-domain case, a jury determined that the City of Laredo’s condemnation was not for an authorized public use and awarded attorney’s fees and expenses to the property owner under Texas *733Property Code § 21.019(c). This fee-shifting statute authorizes the trial court to “make an allowance to the property owner for reasonable and necessary fees” and expenses to the judgment date, when condemnation is denied. The City appealed the award, complaining about deficiencies in the property owner’s attorney’s fees proof under the fee-shifting statute. The court of appeals reformed the award…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- El Apple I, Ltd. v. OlivasTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Laredo v. MontanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
3Cited by121 opinions
- Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Long v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Michael Quinn Sullivan v. Salem AbrahamTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Schimmel v. McGregorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- McCaig Ex Rel. Estate of McCaig v. Wells Fargo Bank (Texas), N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.