Legal Opinion

Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 7289PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Judge.

The parties to this action were all attorneys practicing law in Phoenix. The defendant, Edward L. Hohn, was a month-to-month tenant in a building owned by the plaintiffs Earl F. Boltz, Jr. and Douglas Odegaard (Boltz). On October 13, 1978, Boltz gave Hohn notice that his tenancy was terminated to be effective the last day of December, 1978. Hohn vacated the premises by that date.

On May 4, 1979, Boltz filed suit against Hohn in justice court for $361.78, alleging that he had failed to pay his last month’s rent and various other telephone and copy charges incurred between…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Aguirre v. ROBERT FORREST, PACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. ParmeterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API