Legal Opinion
Minott v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 2000No. 97 CIV. 7127(RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant the Port Authority of New and New Jersey (the “Port Authority”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order of summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Natalie Minott (“Minott”) alleging gender, race, and disability-based employment discrimination, and retaliation for her opposition to these discriminatory employment practices, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., (“Title VII”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barrett v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Walder v. White Plains Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Collette v. St. Luke's Roosevelt HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Velez v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Anyan v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.