Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Loomis’ application to the Industrial Commission was made to recover compensation for loss of wages and the medical expense sustained by him as the result of contracting undulant fever during the period of his employment by Oscar Mayer & Company. The only controversy before the commission was whether the undulant fever contracted by Loomis was caused by that employment.

The commission concluded that Loomis had not met the burden of proof to establish in a satisfactory manner that his illness and disability were caused by that employment, and that therefore his application for compensation must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Winter v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bowen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Vogelsburg v. Mason & Hanger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. F. A. McDonald Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Walraven v. Sprague, Warner & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API