Legal Opinion

Neitzel v. Lawrence

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

The action herein involved is one in claim and delivery, brought by respondents to recover from appellant the possession of a Maxwell truck or its value in case a delivery could not be had. It is apparent from the record that upon the seizure of the truck by the sheriff, appellant furnished a redelivery bond and retained possession of the truck. The cause was submitted to the trial court sitting without a jury, upon a stipulation of facts entered into between counsel for the respective parties. Findings of fact and conclusions of law being expressly waived, the court, after due consideration,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Katz v. ObenchainOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Mark Means Transfer Co. v. MackinzieIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Leaf v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grover v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance v. RemayIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. SutherlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Western Loan & Building Co. v. BandelIdaho Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API