Legal Opinion

United States v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1997No. 23410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

The State of Idaho appeals from the district court’s decision adopting a special master’s recommendation to reject part of the Director’s Report related to twenty-four (24) subcases in Basin 36 1 and holding that previously decreed water rights may not be reduced on the basis of current non-application to beneficial use absent a showing of abandonment, forfeiture, adverse possession or estoppel and that the Director is obligated to accept prior decrees as conclusive proof of the nature of a water right.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

The twenty-four (24) subcases at issue…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kootenai Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McCray v. RosenkranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mulder v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. Clear Lakes Trout Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. A & B IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. Aberdeen-American Falls Ground Water DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API