Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2001No. 25975PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEismann, Justice

The State appeals from an order dismissing this action because the defendant Edward Young (Young) was not brought to trial timely. It also appeals from an order entered prior to the dismissal granting the defendant’s motions in limine. We reverse the order dismissing this action, and we reverse in part the order granting the motions in limine.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 4, 1997, the State charged Young with committing the felony offense of lewd conduct with his 11 year old adopted daughter. Although Young, his wife and daughter lived in Wyoming, this offense allegedly occurred in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. StuartIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Marks v. VehlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Warren v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wilson v. MocabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Clair v. ClairIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API