Getty v. Witter
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock
This is a proceeding in mandamus, brought by defendants in error, to whom we hereinafter refer as relators, or by name, against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter designated as respondents, or as “commission,” and “board,” respectively, when specific reference is made to the Civil Service Commission, and to the board of control of the State Industrial School for Boys at Golden, Colorado. The writ was issued on behalf of relators “and others similarly situated.” Oral argument having been had herein, we dispose of this case on application for supersedeas.
The objective sought in procuring the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKay v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- State Civil Service Commission v. HoagSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- State Board of Corrections v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Roberts v. People Ex Rel. DuncanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Civil Service Commission v. People Ex Rel. BeatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adrian v. AdrianAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Campbell v. State, Dept. of Rev., Div. of Motor Veh.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Fortson v. FortsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Civil Service Commission v. FrazziniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Hewitt v. State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.