Hewitt v. State Civil Service Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, is hereinafter referred to as Hewitt, defendants in error as the commission, and the intervener as Watrous.
' Hewitt brought this action in the nature of mandamus to compel the commission to vacate, as illegal, an examination for the position of state highway engineer and give another in accord with what he alleged were the legal, mandatory requirements therefor, said to have been violated to his detriment. His complaint contained two causes, and motions to dismiss as to each for insufficient facts were sustained. To review the judgment entered accordingly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Destefano v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Getty v. WitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Law Department Employees Union v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Civil Service Commission v. FrazziniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Loughry v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- Spickard v. CIVIL SERV. COM'N OF CITY & CTY. OF DENVERColorado Court of Appeals · 1972