Legal Opinion

Fortson v. Fortson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2006No. S-11332, S-11341PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Blanton and Jayne Fortson divorced after eighteen years of marriage. In this property division case, both parties appeal the superi- or court’s decision to award sixty percent of the marital estate to Jayne and forty percent to Blanton. Because the court did not abuse its discretion in dividing the marital estate, we affirm the sixty-forty division. The parties raise an additional seven issues on appeal. For the reasons set out below, we affirm the court’s requirement of a cash payment to Blanton, its treatment of capital gains taxes and selling costs…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jenkins v. HandelAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Osterkamp v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In re the Marriage of WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Stanhope v. StanhopeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Day v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API