Legal Opinion

Shute v. Fisher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1967No. 519PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

G.S. 1-189 provides in part:

“Where the parties do not consent, the court may, upon the application of either, or of its own motion, direct a reference in the following cases:
“1. Where the trial of an issue of fact requires the examination of a long account on either side; in which case the referee may be directed to hear and decide the whole issue, or to report upon any specific question of fact involved therein.”

While the order of reference is not in the exact language of the statute, an examination of it shows that the facts to be determined by the Referee require the examination of a long…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Tarboro v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Morisey v. . SwinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Vaughan v. . LewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Peyton v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API