State v. Rankin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his pretrial motion to produce and compel the attendance of a proposed witness, George Totten.
On 27 February 1984, the day before defendant’s case was calendared for trial, defense counsel filed the following motion:
Now Comes The Defendant, by and through his attorney, and hereby moves the Court pursuant to 15A-805 to secure the attendance of George Totten, Larry Poole, Bobby James Stanley, Anthony G. Clements and Robert Powell at the trial of the defendant on February 27, 1984. As grounds thereof, he respectfully…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Shute v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. Diaz-TomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. Diaz-TomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. Diaz-TomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. GeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.