Legal Opinion

United States v. Naegele

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 5, 2007No. Criminal 05-0151 (PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN,, District Judge.

On September 8, 2006, the Court issued a scheduling order which, inter alia, directed the defendant to provide his expert disclosures under Rule 16(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and a “written summary of testimony and qualifications of any expert witnesses” on or before November 8, 2006. Scheduling Order ¶ 4. It further directed that for each proposed expert witness the defendant must file with the Court “a brief summary of expert witness qualifications and summary of expert testimony, not to exceed five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael BarileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. DayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ZabavskyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API