Legal Opinion

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 16, 2022No. Criminal No. 2021-0598Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V. ) Criminal No. 21-0598 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON ) and ) ANDREW ZABAVSKY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION Pending before the Court are four pretrial Daubert motions seeking the exclusion of proposed expert testimony at trial. The government has proffered four expert witnesses and defendants have proffered five. Defendant Terence Sutton challenges three of the four government experts — Robert Drago, Carolyn Totaro, and Mark Hammond.!' Defendant Andrew Zabavsky separately challenges Robert Drago. The government…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API