Legal Opinion

United States v. Day

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 8, 2006No. Criminal 04-0358 (PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant Brittian Perry Day’s motion for release pending appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b). On April 20, 2005, after a jury trial, defendant was found guilty on all 22 counts of the indictment filed against him: six counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341; ten counts of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343; five counts of theft or embezzlement from an employee benefit plan under 18 U.S.C. § 664; and one count of fraud in the first degree under D.C.Code §§ 3221 and 3222. On April 6, 2006, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. LibbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. GLADU v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API