Legal Opinion

Huff v. Flynn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1936No. Civil No. 3717PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

Lyman C. Huff, hereinafter called plaintiff, on March 5, 1935, brought suit to quiet title to his interest in a certain lease of land owned by the state of Arizona. There were four defendants, but as three of them defaulted and judgment was rendered against them, we shall hereinafter refer to Charles B. Flynn, the only one of the four who defended the action, as defendant. The latter was personally served in Pima county, and therefore had twenty days in which to answer the complaint. On the 19th day he filed a motion for security for costs, but did not file any other pleading. On the first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beltran v. RollArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Naderhoff v. Geo. Benz & SonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Collins v. StreitzArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Weigel v. HohnArizona Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. TapoArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hendrie Buick Company v. MacKArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kohlbeck v. HandleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Dart v. Valley National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API