Legal Opinion

Dart v. Valley National Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1967No. 1 CA-CIV 417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The appellants’ motion to vacate a default judgment was denied and this appeal followed.

The Valley National Bank of Arizona was the plaintiff in the trial court. On 15 January 1965, the Bank filed a complaint containing two claims for relief. The defendants were Mr. and Mrs. Green who are not parties to this appeal, and Mr. and Mrs. Dart who are the appellants.

The first claim for relief was based upon a promissory note wherein the Greens were the makers and the Bank was the payee. Issues in relation to the first claim for relief are not before us. The second claim for relief is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation & Drainage District v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Huff v. FlynnArizona Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FogelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Haver v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API