Legal Opinion
Commercial Bank of Spanish Fork v. Spanish Fork South Irr. Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1944No. 6718PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, District Judge.
The Spanish Fork South Irrigation Company, defendant and appellant, perfected this appeal from a judgment in the amount of $525 rendered against defendant and in favor of the Commercial Bank of Spanish Fork, plaintiff and respondent, by the District Court of Utah County, sitting without a jury.
The material facts established by the pleadings and the evidence introduced at the trial may be summarized as follows:
The defendant is a mutual irrigation company, incorporated under the laws of this state. Its shares of stock, which had all been issued and were outstanding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holbrook v. . New Jersey Zinc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Fifth Avenue Bank v. Forty-second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate Counseling Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Milford State Bank v. West Field Canal & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
- Morgan v. Hidden Splendor Mining Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1957