Morgan v. Hidden Splendor Mining Co.
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, owners of certain mining claims, alleged in their complaint that pursuant to lease obligations assumed by the defendant as assignee and a “Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement” between the plaintiffs and defendant, the defendant agreed to perform not less than $150,000 of exploration and development work prior to February 1, 1956; that defendant failed to do so and that on February 21, 1957, defendant was served by registered mail with a notice of the breach of said covenant, giving defendant twenty days from the receipt of said notice to cure and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Taylor v. Robertson Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Barquin v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vincent Chiodo v. General Waterworks Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Irwin v. Marvel Petroleum CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Betancourt v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1975
- Morgan v. Hidden Splendor Mining Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1959