Legal Opinion
Valentine v. Real Estate Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 1960No. 2562PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
Petitioner seeks our review of a decision of the Real Estate Commission suspending her real-estate broker’s license for 90 days. Code 1951, U-772(e) (9) (Supp. VIII).
Pursuant to the procedures outlined in Code 1951, 45-1409, petitioner was charged with violations of: (1) 45-1408(a), making a substantial misrepresentation; (2) 45-1408(g), failing within a reasonable time to account for or to remit money belonging to others; and (3) 45-1408(h), demonstrating such unworthiness or incompetence as a real-estate broker as to endanger the interests of the public. After a public…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beach v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Syndicated Const. Corporation v. RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Burke v. LoughrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Seebold v. HolbrookDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frain v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re C. I. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Donnelly Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- District of Columbia v. TschudinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Glenwood Cemetery v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.