Seebold v. Holbrook
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant, defendant below, was sued for damages for breach of a contract. The case was tried by the court, sitting without a jury, and on November 18, 1953, the court entered a finding for plaintiff. On November 23 defendant filed a motion for a new trial and also requested permission to file an amended answer and counterclaim. The motion was denied on December 1, 1953, and judgment entered. On the same date a motion for a rehearing of defendant’s motion for new trial was filed. The rehearing was granted, and the motion for new trial was again denied on December 9.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Randolph v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Burke v. LoughrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Valentine v. Real Estate CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Gardner v. B. F. Saul Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Willis v. George Washington Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955