Legal Opinion

Syndicated Const. Corporation v. Ross

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1950No. 924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

At the time this appeal was being argued the court called attention of counsel to the fact that the notice of appeal had seemingly been filed more than ten days after the entry of judgment, in violation of our Rule 27(a).

It having been represented to this court that the record showing the judgment appealed from to have been entered on February 27, 1950 was in error and that .the judgment had actually been entered a day later, on February 28, 1950, and that hence the notice of appeal was filed timely on March 10, 1950; and counsel for appellant having sought an opportunity to have the record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beach v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Valentine v. Real Estate CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Burke v. LoughrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Kyle v. WileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Nesbit v. PollakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API