Legal Opinion
In Re Mayen
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1920No. Crim. No. 742PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
By this habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner seeks an order directing that he be taken from the custody of the warden of the state prison at San Quentin and remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Los Angeles County.
Petitioner, who had been convicted of a felony in the superior court for Los Angeles County and by that court sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin, appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction. Subsequently, the judge of the trial court, pursuant to section 1243 of the Penal Code, issued a certificate of probable cause, certifying that, in his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- In re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex Parte McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex parte ArrasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Older v. Superior Court of the State in and for KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re StolikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- United States Ex Rel. Belardi v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- In Re AlboriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.