Legal Opinion

Ex parte Arras

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1889No. 20473PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an application for the discharge of the prisoner, under a writ of habeas corpus, from the state prison at San Quentin. The petition alleges that the petitioner “is detained, confined, restrained, and imprisoned by virtue of a judgment and commitment, which judgment and commitment attempt to imprison him for two years in said prison, and to impose a large fine, and order his further imprisonment in said prison in case he do not pay said fine for a long period of time, to wit, for one day for each dollar of said fine not paid; that the two years’ imprisonment ordered by said judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. ScherbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Ex parte WadleighCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. In Re SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. People ex rel. Gately v. SageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. People v. RibolsiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API