Legal Opinion

Briceno v. Scribner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2009No. 07-55665PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

555 F.3d 1069 (2009)

Alberto Francisco BRICENO, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-55665.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted August 8, 2008.

Filed February 23, 2009.

Vivian A. Fu, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

Ronald A. Jakob, Deputy Attorney General; Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General; Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California), San Diego, CA, for the respondent-appellee.

Before: ROGER J. MINER,[*] KIM McLANE WARDLAW,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scalia v. Cnty. of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. Joshua Gonzales v. Connie GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. (HC) Fort v. HattonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Shaw v. High Desert State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Vasquez v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API