Legal Opinion
Tribal Council of Blackfeet Indian Reservation v. Ickes
District Court, D. Montana
Decided December 12, 1944No. 452PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
This is an action, in general terms, in which the plaintiffs seek a judicial determination of their rights under certain statutory provisions, and the rules, orders and regulations therein specified as adopted and promulgated by the Secretary of the Interi- or of the United States and administered by him and also through his subordinate officers, the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, the Superintendent of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, in Montana, and the Forest Supervisor of said reservation; and in which plaintiffs complain that the defendants in their official…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Butterworth v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Colorado v. TollSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Neher v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mary Martinez v. Fred A. Seaton, as Secretary of the Interior of the United States, and the Southern Ute TribeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Thomas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
- Buffalo Creek Co-Op. State Grazing Dist. v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1947
- Mouton v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1952