Legal Opinion
Buffalo Creek Co-Op. State Grazing Dist. v. Anderson
District Court, D. Montana
Decided May 16, 1947No. 860PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
In the above-entitled cause, which is an action on a declaratory judgment, the questions arising at this time are found in motions to dismiss by the defendants, and tiheir opening brief appears to contain a fair statement of the case.
The second paragraph of the amended motion on behalf of the United States and its officers therein named reads as follows: “That the defendants Clinton Anderson, H. H. Bennett, Julius A. Krug, Fred W. Johnson, and R. L. Nicholson are officials of the United States of America, and each of said defendants in their official capacities arc…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gray v. New Mexico Military InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. HanleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
- Gray v. The New Mexico Military InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957