Preferred Mutual Insurance v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
An insurance company has a duty to defend an action against its insured when the allegations of the complaint against the insured bring the action within the coverage of the insured’s policy. Motorists Mut. v. Trainor (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 41, paragraph two of the syllabus. See, also, Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 177. In the instant case, the allegations of negligence set forth in Victor Thompson’s complaint against Albert Sabo bring the action within the coverage of Sabo’s homeowners policy; and, the presence of additional allegations, which state an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Gearing v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Co. of West Virginia v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.