Legal Opinion

McKenney v. Jack Eckerd Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1991No. 23316PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in McKenney v. Jack Eckerd Co., 299 S.C. 523, 386 S.E. (2d) 263 (Ct. App. 1989).

We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Petitioner, Ronald McKenney (McKenney), issued Respondent, Jack Eckerd Co. (Eckerd), a check for $3.55. Due to a bank error, the check was returned to Eckerd marked “insufficient funds.” Shortly thereafter, the bank notified Eckerd of its error. Approximately one month later, Eckerd swore out a fraudulent check warrant against McKenney.

When the case was nolle prossed, McKenney instituted a malicious…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. MacK v. RileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Harrelson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. McKenney v. Jack Eckerd Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Johnson v. PackerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1817

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Swick v. LiautaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Beaman v. FreesmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Bennett v. R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  5. Robert Salley v. Paul MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API