Legal Opinion

McKenney v. Jack Eckerd Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1989No. 1394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

Appellant Ronald McKenney sued respondent Jack Eckerd Company for malicious prosecution. (Another cause of ac tion, initially alleged, was dismissed without prejudice.) The Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of Eckerd on the ground that “a nolle prosequi or dismissal by the prosecuting authority does not constitute sufficient termination of a criminal prosecution to support an action for malicious prosecution.” We affirm.

“On motion for summary judgment, the evidence and inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts contained in the record must be viewed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacK v. RileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. McCaskey v. ShawCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Harrelson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Inman v. LaresCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKenney v. Jack Eckerd CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BookertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API