Legal Opinion

Ruff v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 8, 1975No. 20125PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Thomas Ruff was awarded One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars actual and punitive damages in his suit against Eckerds Drugs for malicious prosecution. Eckerds appeals urging the lower court erred in refusing its motion for a non-suit and directed verdict. We agree.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the respondent, he and three companions were shopping in an Eckerds Drug Store when they were approached by the manager who suspected them of shoplifting. The respondent assaulted the manager 1 and he followed the respondent outside and ac cused him of shoplifting. They verbally…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parrott v. Plowden Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. Jennings v. Clearwater Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Margolis v. TelechSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Prosser v. ParsonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Janetka v. DabeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Janetka v. DabeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Jose A. Rivera-Marcano v. Normeat Royal Dane Quality A/s, (Formerly Normeat-Holding & Export)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Gaar v. N. Myrtle Beach Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API