Bennett v. R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (Docket Nos. 114 and 115). 1 The Defendants are: R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLC (“R & L”), Frank Dominic Finley (“Finley”), James Lee Bullard, Jr. (“Billiard”), and David John McGinnis, Sr. (“McGinnis”), (collectively “the Defendants”). If their motion is not granted, they seek a remittitur. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
I.…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Daniczek v. SpencerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Scott v. BenderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Salim v. DahlbergDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Doe v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.