Legal Opinion

Bennett v. R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 3:08cv498PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (Docket Nos. 114 and 115). 1 The Defendants are: R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLC (“R & L”), Frank Dominic Finley (“Finley”), James Lee Bullard, Jr. (“Billiard”), and David John McGinnis, Sr. (“McGinnis”), (collectively “the Defendants”). If their motion is not granted, they seek a remittitur. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

I.…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Daniczek v. SpencerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  2. Scott v. BenderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  4. Salim v. DahlbergDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Doe v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API