Legal Opinion
Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1978No. 74 Civ. 2954PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
At the end of a three-week trial involving 47 witnesses and hundreds of documents, a jury found that defendant Amstar Corporation (“Amstar”) had violated § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and was liable to both plaintiffs, Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. (“Fuchs”) and Francis J. Prael, doing business as Lewis & Company (“Prael”). Plaintiffs’ claims arose out of Amstar’s April 1, 1974 termination of general sugar brokers, including Fuchs and Prael, and the events leading up to the termination. 1 The jury awarded Fuchs $80,000 and Prael $70,-000; each…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Federal Paper Bd. Co., Inc. v. AmataDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Argus, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.