Legal Opinion
Argus, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 27, 1985No. 79 Civ. 4525 (MP)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
This is an antitrust suit for violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, claiming damages pursuant to § 4 of the Clayton Act for alleged injuries to the business or properties of the plaintiffs, Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation.
The defendant, Eastman Kodak Company, has moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Kodak contends that: 1) neither plaintiff has standing to sue under § 4 because neither plaintiff is a “person injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- In Re: The Bennett Funding Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Mroz v. City of TonawandaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Aventis Environmental Science USA LP v. Scotts Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Colburn v. MaynardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.