Legal Opinion

Western Engineering & Construction Co. v. Nevada Amusement Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1910No. 1762PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District. Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Esmeralda County; Frank P. Langan, Judge. Action by the Western Engineering and Construction Company and another against the Nevada Amusement Company and others, in which the Interstate Lumber and Mill Company and another intervened. From a judgment denying relief to the intervener named, it appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talbot, J.:

Pursuant to stipulation, this action was tried by a referee who made his findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of respondents and against the allowance of judgment on the lien which had been filed and was sought to be enforced by the appellant the Interstate Lumber and Mill Company as an intervener. These findings and directions for judgment were dated December 24, 1907, above the name of the referee, and are also indorsed as " Report of referee, dated December 24, 1907, filed December 26,1907, ” over the signature of the clerk. The appellant was satisfied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirman v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Boyd v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Burns v. RodeferNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Hart v. SpencerNevada Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ward v. Pittsburg Silver Peak Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Reinhart Co. v. Oklahoma Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rosenthal v. RosenthalNevada Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API