Legal Opinion

Hart v. Spencer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1907No. 1702PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Washoe County; B. F. Curler, Judge. Action by John Hart against George S. Spencer and his wife. From a judgment dismissing the cause of action, plaintiff appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Norcross, J.:

The notice of appeal in this cause specifies that the appeal is taken from the judgment and order of the trial court sustaining defendants’ motion dismissing the cause of action from the calendar. The transcript on appeal is in two'volumes. Volume 1 contains apparently the originals of papers filed in the case in the lower court, excepting a paper designated "Affidavit on Motion for a New Trial and on Appeal,” which last-mentioned document comprises volume 2.

Respondents have moved to strike out and discharge from the record on appeal all of volume 2, and all the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. ArcherNevada Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirman v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Smith v. Wells Estate Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Western Engineering & Construction Co. v. Nevada Amusement Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Shirk v. PalmerNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Smith v. Wells Estate Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API