Legal Opinion

Reinhart Co. v. Oklahoma Gold Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1924No. 2647Published

1Opinion

Party who has appeared in action should be given notice of every application when he has any interest to appear and oppose it. Baylies Trial Prac. (2d ed.) 63; Pratt v. Rice, 7 Nev. 123; Gamble v. Court, 27 Nev. 244. Order made without notice is void.46 Cal. 32. Notice must appear in record on appeal. Herrlich v. McDonald, 22 P. 299.

Extending time to tender bill of exceptions is jurisdictional act; ex parte order therefor is void. Taylor v. Derry, 35 P. 60.

Copy of judgment roll is not to be annexed to copy of statement on appeal, unless appeal is taken from judgment.24 Nev. 461; 45 Nev. 265.

Op…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dayton Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. SeawellNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ward v. Pittsburg Silver Peak Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Irving National Bank v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Pratt v. RiceNevada Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API