Legal Opinion

Baker v. Schofield

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1917No. 133PublishedCited by 45 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This is an action by John W. Schofield, as receiver of the Merchants’ National Bank of Seattle, Washington, insolvent since 1895, against Charles H. Baker, receiver of the bank from 1895 to 1899, and others, seeking a decree declaring the defendants to be holders of certain real property in Seattle in trust for the plaintiff, and asking a conveyance thereof to the plaintiff.

The property in controversy is block 430 of Seattle Tide Lands, a tract of some twelve acres, and the leasehold of the harbor area lying in front of that block. In conformity with the provisions of the state law, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  3. National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API