Legal Opinion

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 17, 2020No. 4:08-cv-00160Unknown

1Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM, etc., ) CASE NO. 4:08CV0160 ) Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON v. ) ) FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE ) CORPORATION, etc., et al., ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendants. ) [Resolving ECF No. 485] Pending is Plaintiff Ohio Public Employees Retirement System’s (““OPERS”) Request For Sua Sponte Summary Judgment (ECF No. 485). The Court has been advised, having reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs,’ and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nutrition Labs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API