Legal Opinion

Thomas Eisenrich v. Minneapolis Retail Meat

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 31, 2009No. 08-2230Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2230 ___________ Thomas Eisenrich, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters and * Food Handlers Pension Plan, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: December 12, 2008 Filed: July 31, 2009 ___________ Before COLLOTON and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge. ___________ COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. After retiring from his job as a meat cutter, Thomas Eisenrich began receiving monthly benefits from the Minneapolis Retail Meat…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API