Legal Opinion

Britz v. American Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The insurer’s first defense is that the truck was never stolen. This issue was submitted in a special verdict to the jury which answered that it was stolen on April 13, 1953. The defense rests on inferences that Britz would not have acted as the insurer claims he did if the truck had really been stolen. Britz testified unequivocally that the truck was stolen and he denies acting as the insurer alleges he did. This was clearly a jury question and the jury’s finding that the theft occurred is amply supported by Britz’s testimony.

The next defense is that Britz did not comply with the terms of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Vangindertaelen v. Phenix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Underwood Veneer Co. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bachhuber v. BoosalisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ciokewicz v. Lynn Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gerrard Realty Corp. v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Allen v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Bank of Viroqua v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Melissa Anderson v. Thomas AulWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API